| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Sticky:[December] Command Destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ganthrithor wrote: I just fought a Stork on TQ in a cruiser explicitly designed to bait and kill small ships and lost because-- as I found out post-fight when I did a killboard search on the dude I fought-- you made a destroyer that does 250DPS...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2016.01.21 04:34:17
|
2. Sticky:Damage profiles by ship group and weapon type in 2015 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hal Morsh wrote: Hendrink Collie wrote: I guess the obvious question is CCP happy that 4 out of the 5 most popular hull + weapon combinations are cruiser hulls? Even real world navies on the seas aren't using battleships anymore. It's al...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2016.01.07 15:18:34
|
3. Connection Hunt - in Wormholes [original thread]
Andrew Jester wrote: found it, send me 500m and I'll contract you the bookmark Love this guy... took me a while to learn to appreciate him, but he is awesome.
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.21 19:44:37
|
4. CSM - What might be helpful in bringing in new players faster? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Fixing and maintaining EVELOPEDIA might be useful for retaining new players and making this less of a Rubik's Cube for them.
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.21 01:14:39
|
5. EVELOPEDIA is currently crap, needs addressed - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Rawketsled wrote: Orob Ninebands wrote: [...] I could troll-edit the whole damn thing and nobody would notice. Then go do that. The wiki is filled with outdated information, not malicious information. That's evidence that despite people ...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 23:38:26
|
6. Items transversing the Exits - in Wormholes [original thread]
MooMooDachshundCow wrote: I don't think that the developers intend to limit this game to what is scientifically feasible. As evidenced by the fact that nearly all the physics in this game is totally unlike RL. You can't use RL logic or sci...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:57:48
|
7. Items transversing the Exits - in Wormholes [original thread]
Erica Dusette wrote: Pterodactyl? I suppose it could be worse . wtf?
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:53:04
|
8. Items transversing the Exits - in Wormholes [original thread]
W-Space life has never been about asset safety. Say "no" to asset safety. Keep w-space the unique place that we know and love.
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:51:30
|
9. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Your cheese has been moved.. That right there pretty much sums up the crying....
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:48:57
|
10. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DeeeBo wrote: CCP just needs to admit that the recent changes are a failure, just like the Incarna expansion was. I mean give us a reason to log on this winter. Roll back the Phoebe jump changes, bring back Dominion SOV, let us slug it out all ...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:46:54
|
11. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Counter-Point: I have heard many, many, many people express their approval of the new Sov mechanics. Not everyone thinks it is bad. Remember, we mostly only hear from the upset people in this game.
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:45:25
|
12. EVELOPEDIA is currently crap, needs addressed - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Rawketsled wrote: You can edit many pages within the wiki. So, you should use your frustrations to correct faults that you find. Start fixing the wiki, then come back and say "Hey CSM, I'm fixing this wiki all by myself. It's a big job, and ...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.20 22:35:48
|
13. EVELOPEDIA is currently crap, needs addressed - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Rawketsled wrote: You can make edits to the wiki, right? That is what I'm not sure about. Which is why I mentioned that I didn't know if it was supposed to be community maintained. The point is that it is not maintained, appears to be a CCP...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.15 01:36:05
|
14. Cyber Bullying - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Mudekii wrote: He is correct it is considered cyber bullying and the fact that Code is loosely based on a fanatical religious cult is another good reason they should be dealt with, but again you all are taking shots at him even the CSM who are ...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.15 01:26:57
|
15. Cyber Bullying - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I'm going to have to disagree with OP. I'm against cyberbullying, but ganking does not fit the definintion of cyberbullying. Losing spaceships in a spaceship combat game is not bullying. Stretching the definition of cyberbullying so far out of w...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.15 01:22:21
|
16. EVELOPEDIA is currently crap, needs addressed - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
So, I have been fairly frustrated with EvElopedia, which I would point out appears to be CCP's official wiki, as it is on the eveonline.com domain. Much of the information in the EvElopedia is outdated and contains many innaccuracies. When Googl...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.15 01:12:37
|
17. Sticky:[Focus Group] Tactical Destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Uh, to all the crybabies worrying about running FW complexes: Run your sites in a T3D if you are worried about T3Ds coming into your plex. So damn simple, but I know, you are blinded by tears and can't see the logical answer.
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.07 17:43:07
|
18. Sticky:[Focus Group] Tactical Destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Oh for FFS, leave the T3Ds alone. They are fine. People just like to cry and don't want to adapt. I have been murdered by T3Ds plenty and have lost a bunch trying to fly them (yup, I'm bad), and still I say leave them alone.
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.10.07 17:38:25
|
19. Null Sec WH change is literally AIDS - in Wormholes [original thread]
Justin Cody wrote: Orob Ninebands wrote: Ok, so, just looking for some feedback here: I know CCP said they would "slightly" nerf C5<>Nullsec holes, but they never said what that meant in terms of numbers. So, just curious, how has it...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.08.08 23:28:20
|
20. Null Sec WH change is literally AIDS - in Wormholes [original thread]
Scott Ormands wrote: So, an odd occurrence to report but today one of my corp mates had a c5<>null despawn in front of him (not eol and wasn't massed) and immediately a new sig popped up that was another null but as soon as he tried to ju...
- by Orob Ninebands - at 2015.08.07 15:55:20
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |